Employment due diligence in Peruvian transactions
Labor due diligence in Peru for investors and deal counsel: scope, data room request list, typical red flags and how findings shape price, warranties and indemnities.
Decisions
A focused review of a Peruvian target’s employment position, built around the transaction timetable, that tells buyers and investors which issues affect price, structure or closing conditions.
In a Peruvian transaction, employment issues rarely stop a deal, but they frequently change its price, its structure or the protections the buyer needs. Unpaid benefits, reclassified contracts, outsourcing arrangements that do not meet legal requirements and pending inspections are liabilities that stay with the business after closing. Employment due diligence is how a buyer finds them before signing.
Peruvian employment liabilities can be large relative to the size of a target, and they are not always visible in the financial statements. Fixed-term contracts used for permanent work may be reclassified as indefinite. Pay items treated as non-remunerative may, in fact, form part of the base for CTS (a severance fund the employer deposits twice a year into a bank account in the employee’s name) and gratificaciones (two statutory bonuses paid in July and December). Outsourcing arrangements that fail the autonomy test can make the target the employer of the contractor’s staff. SUNAFIL, Peru’s national labor inspection authority, may have ongoing proceedings with fines expressed in UIT (the tax reference unit, S/ 5,500 in 2026).
The buyer needs to know which of these issues exist, how large they are and how to protect itself. Our guide to employment risk in Peru explains how exposure is identified and sized, and our note on employment due diligence in Peruvian transactions describes the process in more detail.
We work to the deal timetable. We agree the scope and materiality threshold with the deal team or the lead counsel, issue a targeted document request and review the data room: employment contracts, payroll and benefits, outsourcing and staffing agreements, safety records, internal rules, inspection and litigation files, and collective agreements.
Findings are ranked by impact. For material ones, we size the exposure and explain our assumptions, so that the buyer can decide between a price adjustment, a specific indemnity, a pre-closing condition or simply an integration task. We then help translate each finding into deal terms. Our note on the employment risks to review before closing lists the issues we look at most closely.
The service covers scoping, data room review, management questions, a red-flag report in English, liability sizing, proposed contractual protections and integration notes. Vendor due diligence for sellers follows the same method.
Our review depends on the information made available and on the time the transaction allows. We do not audit the target’s accounts, value the business or provide tax advice. Liability estimates are legal assessments based on stated assumptions, not guarantees of what a court or authority will decide.
Transactions involve many advisors. We follow the lead counsel’s report format, coordinate with the financial and tax due diligence teams so that employment liabilities are neither missed nor counted twice, and give the buyer’s finance team figures they can use in the model. After closing, our integration notes feed into an employment audit or an employment compliance program for the acquired entity.
Send us the deal timetable, the data room index and the materiality threshold, if one has been set. We will confirm the scope and the review plan.
Scope around the deal
We agree materiality thresholds, priorities and deadlines with the deal team and the lead counsel.
Review the data room
We review contracts, payroll, benefits, outsourcing, inspections, litigation and safety records.
Size and rank
We rank findings by impact and size the material ones, explaining our assumptions.
Translate into deal terms
We propose warranties, indemnities, conditions and integration steps that address each material finding.
Yes. Most buyers ask for a red-flag report focused on issues above a materiality threshold. We agree the threshold and scope at the outset and state them in the report.
The answer depends on the structure of the transaction and how the business is transferred. It is one of the first points we analyze, because it affects both liabilities and integration.
Yes. We frequently work as Peruvian employment counsel alongside a foreign law firm that leads the transaction, following its report format and timetable.