Dismissal for serious misconduct in Peru: grounds, proof and procedure
Dismissal for misconduct in Peru requires a statutory falta grave, objective proof and a written pre-dismissal procedure. What foreign employers must get right.
Guide · Termination
Peru does not allow termination at will. Once probation ends, an employer can only dismiss for a cause set out in the law, following a written procedure, and must be able to prove the cause in court. This guide explains the grounds, the procedure, the cost of getting it wrong — severance or reinstatement — and the alternatives that often make more sense.
For employers used to at-will jurisdictions, termination is where Peruvian employment law feels most different. There is no general right to end an indefinite employment relationship by giving notice. After probation, the employer needs a legal reason, a formal procedure and evidence — and if any of the three fails, the consequence may be not only a severance payment but an order to take the employee back.
This guide explains how termination works as a system: the ways an employment relationship can end, the grounds for dismissal, the procedure step by step, the types of unlawful dismissal and their consequences, and the negotiated routes that usually produce more predictable outcomes. It is written for general managers, HR leads and regional headquarters who approve exits.
Key point
In Peru the real question before any exit is not “how much notice?” but “which route?” — just cause with procedure, the end of a valid fixed term, resignation, or a mutual termination. Each route has its own requirements and its own risk.
Case law is part of the framework. In case 1124-2001-AA/TC (2002), the Constitutional Court ordered reinstatement for dismissals made without stating a cause. In case 976-2001-AA/TC (2003), it systematized the categories of null, unjustified (incausado) and fraudulent dismissal. In case 0206-2005-PA/TC (2005), a binding precedent, it defined when constitutional protection proceedings (amparo) are available in labor matters. In practice, reinstatement claims are now also pursued through ordinary labor courts.
The statute lists the causes of termination: death of the employee (or of an individual employer); resignation; completion of the work or service, fulfillment of a condition or expiry of a fixed term; mutual termination; permanent absolute disability; retirement; dismissal in the cases and form permitted by law; and termination for objective causes (collective dismissals).
Three of these routes carry most of the day-to-day practice:
| Route | Requirement | Main risk |
|---|---|---|
| Dismissal for just cause | Legal ground, written procedure, proof | Arbitrary, unjustified or fraudulent dismissal findings |
| Mutual termination (mutuo disenso) | Written agreement or record in the final settlement | Challenge for lack of genuine consent |
| Resignation | Employee’s decision with 30 days’ notice (waivable) | “Forced” resignations recharacterized as dismissal |
| Expiry of a valid fixed term | Genuine objective cause, term respected | Contract found to be indefinite |
Resignation requires 30 days’ notice, which the employer may waive; a request for waiver is deemed accepted if not rejected in writing within three days. Retirement becomes mandatory and automatic at 70, unless otherwise agreed. Our briefing on resignation, mutual termination and dismissal in Peru compares these routes.
For employees working four or more hours a day, a dismissal requires a just cause set out in the law and duly proven.
Causes related to capacity are: a supervening deterioration of physical or mental faculties or ineptitude that prevents the employee from doing the job; deficient performance compared with the employee’s own capacity and the average output in similar roles and conditions; and an unjustified refusal to undergo a medical examination or follow prophylactic or curative measures. Capacity dismissals are demanding to prove: the employer needs objective performance evidence and must give the employee at least 30 calendar days to demonstrate capacity or correct the deficiencies.
Causes related to conduct are serious misconduct (falta grave), a criminal conviction for an intentional offense, and professional disqualification. Serious misconduct is defined in article 25 and includes, in summary:
Serious misconduct is established by its objective proof within the employment procedure, regardless of any criminal proceedings. The briefing on dismissal for serious misconduct in Peru analyzes each category.
The procedure is short, but every step matters in court.
Two principles cut across the procedure. First, immediacy: the employer must act within a reasonable time after learning of the misconduct and completing its investigation, or the misconduct may be deemed condoned. Second, consistency: the employer cannot later rely on a cause different from the one stated in the dismissal letter. In litigation, the employer bears the burden of proving the cause.
Watch out
Most dismissals fail on procedure, not substance: vague charges, a response period shorter than six days, a dismissal letter that adds new facts, or a decision taken months after the facts were known. Our briefing on mistakes that undermine a dismissal lists them.
A dismissal is arbitrary when no cause is stated or the cause cannot be proven in court. The statute provides severance as the remedy: 1.5 monthly ordinary salaries for each full year of service, capped at 12 monthly salaries, with fractions of a year paid proportionally by months and days. Probation is not counted.
Constitutional case law adds two categories that allow the employee to seek reinstatement instead of severance:
The employee who has been dismissed arbitrarily may generally choose between reinstatement, through the courts, and severance; taking the severance payment closes the reinstatement route. This is a case-law criterion that should be applied with care in each case. The briefing on unfair dismissal in Peru: severance and reinstatement risk explains the choice.
A dismissal is null when its real motive is: union membership or activities; being a candidate for or acting as employee representative; filing a complaint or participating in proceedings against the employer (unless serious misconduct exists); discrimination on grounds such as sex, race, religion, opinion, language or disability; pregnancy, birth and breastfeeding, when the dismissal occurs during pregnancy or within 90 days after birth (presumed unless a just cause is proven); HIV status; disability; and, since Law 32431, a cancer diagnosis, its treatment or effects. The cancer protection extends to part-time employees, employees on probation and trusted employees, and Supreme Decree 008-2026-TR adds a presumption: if the employee had disclosed the diagnosis and the employer cannot prove a just cause unrelated to health, the dismissal is presumed linked to the illness. Employers must also make reasonable adjustments without reducing pay.
The consequence of a null dismissal is reinstatement with payment of back wages.
Some employer conduct is treated as equivalent to dismissal: failure to pay wages on time, unjustified reduction of pay or category, relocation intended to cause harm, failure to observe health and safety measures, violence or serious verbal abuse, discrimination, sexual harassment and refusal of reasonable adjustments for employees with disabilities. The employee must first give the employer written notice and at least six calendar days to correct the conduct, and may then seek an order to stop the hostility or treat himself or herself as dismissed and claim severance.
| Scenario | Typical consequence | Deadline for the employee |
|---|---|---|
| Just cause proven, procedure respected | Termination stands; final settlement due | 30 calendar days to challenge |
| Cause stated but not proven | Severance: 1.5 salaries per year, capped at 12 | 30 calendar days |
| No cause stated | Severance or, at the employee’s choice, reinstatement | 30 calendar days |
| Invented or fabricated cause | Reinstatement possible | 30 calendar days |
| Discriminatory or protected motive | Reinstatement with back pay | 30 calendar days |
| Early end of valid fixed-term contract | 1.5 salaries per month remaining, capped at 12 | 30 calendar days |
The 30-day period runs from the dismissal; days when the courts are not operating are not counted.
Protection against arbitrary dismissal applies to employees working four or more hours a day who have passed probation. Employees still on probation and part-time employees (fewer than four hours a day on average) do not have it, but they remain protected against null dismissals — and, under Law 32431, against dismissal motivated by a cancer diagnosis. “No protection against arbitrary dismissal” never means that any motive is acceptable.
Management and trusted employees are protected against arbitrary dismissal like other employees. Constitutional case law admits the withdrawal of trust as a ground for ending the relationship only for employees who were hired directly into a trusted position; an employee promoted into such a role from an ordinary position cannot simply be “untrusted” out of the company. The qualification of the position must also match reality: a label in the payroll is not enough.
A mutual termination (mutuo disenso) must be recorded in writing or in the final settlement of benefits. Because it closes the relationship by agreement, it removes the need to prove a cause — but only if the employee’s consent is genuine. As a professional recommendation:
However the relationship ends, the employer must pay the final settlement of benefits (liquidación de beneficios sociales): pending salary, any accrued CTS not yet deposited, the proportional gratificación for the months worked in the semester (if at least one full month was worked), accrued unused leave and the proportional leave for the incomplete year, plus any severance or agreed incentive. Within 48 hours of termination, the employer must also deliver the certificate that allows the employee to withdraw his or her CTS funds from the bank. The briefing on final settlement on termination in Peru details each item.
Terminations for objective causes — force majeure, economic, technological, structural or similar reasons, dissolution and liquidation, or insolvency restructuring — follow a separate procedure before the labor authority. For economic, technological, structural or similar reasons, the procedure applies only if it affects at least 10% of the total workforce, and it involves information to the union or employees, negotiation, an expert report and a decision by the authority. Restructurings of this kind require dedicated planning and are outside the scope of individual dismissal procedures.
Illustrative scenario
Illustrative scenario: a services company discovers that a supervisor has shared confidential client pricing with a competitor. HR suspends the investigation for four months while waiting for a regional decision, then sends a dismissal letter citing “loss of trust”. The dismissal is exposed on three fronts: immediacy (the delay may be read as condonation), consistency (the letter does not describe the misconduct actually found) and procedure (no notice of charges). A prompt investigation, a precise notice of charges citing the disclosure of confidential information, and a dismissal letter limited to those facts would have put the company in a defensible position.
When misconduct surfaces, start with how to document workplace misconduct and decide whether a lesser sanction fits using disciplinary measures in Peru. If dismissal is on the table, read dismissal for serious misconduct, prepare the notice of charges and respect the employee’s right of defense. Before signing anything, review mistakes that undermine a dismissal and size the downside with unfair dismissal in Peru. When a negotiated exit makes more sense, see resignation, mutual termination and dismissal.
Our terminations and exits team structures individual and negotiated exits, and disciplinary procedures supports investigations and charge letters. The employment compliance check gives a first view of your disciplinary and documentation practices. For context on hiring and contract types, see the employment contracts guide; foreign companies should also read employing in Peru.
Termination in Peru is a regulated decision, not an administrative one. A legal ground, a clean procedure and solid evidence make a dismissal defensible; missing any of them turns it into severance or reinstatement exposure. Where the case is not strong, a genuinely voluntary mutual termination is usually the more rational route. Either way, the decision should be taken with Peruvian review, early, and with the documents ready.
In this guide
Dismissal for misconduct in Peru requires a statutory falta grave, objective proof and a written pre-dismissal procedure. What foreign employers must get right.
The pre-dismissal notice in Peru (carta de preaviso) defines what the employer can prove later. What it must contain, the response period and errors to avoid.
Before a dismissal in Peru, the employee has a statutory right to respond to the charges. What that right requires in practice and how employers should handle it.
Unfair dismissal in Peru can cost statutory severance of 1.5 monthly salaries per year, capped at 12, or reinstatement under constitutional case law. How to size the risk.
A mutual termination agreement in Peru (mutuo disenso) is often the safest exit. How it compares with resignation and dismissal, and how to document it.
Documenting misconduct in Peru decides whether a dismissal survives. How to run an internal investigation, preserve evidence and build a file a labor judge will accept.
Disciplinary action in Peru ranges from warnings to unpaid suspension and dismissal. How to choose a proportionate measure, document it and align group policies.
Dismissal mistakes in Peru turn justified terminations into severance or reinstatement claims. The errors foreign employers make most often, phase by phase.
How we can help
Advice on ending employment relationships in Peru in a way that respects the law, controls cost and reduces the risk of reinstatement claims, whether the exit is for cause, negotiated or part of a restructuring.
Help to investigate misconduct, choose a proportionate measure and run the procedure Peruvian law requires, so that the decision stands if an employee challenges it.
An employer can end the relationship without a proven cause, but the dismissal is then arbitrary and gives rise to statutory severance of 1.5 monthly salaries per full year of service, capped at 12. The exposure does not stop there: where the dismissal is made without any stated cause, constitutional case law allows the employee to seek reinstatement instead. For that reason, negotiated mutual terminations are usually preferred to unilateral dismissals without cause.
Peru does not use notice periods for dismissal in the way many jurisdictions do. Instead, before dismissing for conduct or capacity, the employer must give the employee written notice of the charges and at least six calendar days to respond, or at least 30 calendar days to demonstrate capacity or correct deficiencies. Only then can the dismissal letter be issued.
The employee has 30 calendar days from the dismissal to file a claim for null dismissal, arbitrary dismissal or hostile acts. Under the regulations, days on which the courts are not operating are not counted. After that period, the right to challenge expires.
Yes. Employer and employee may agree to end the relationship by mutual consent (mutuo disenso), which must be recorded in writing or in the final settlement of benefits. It is valid if the employee’s consent is genuine. Agreements obtained through pressure or presented as a condition for receiving statutory payments can be challenged, so the process and the documentation matter as much as the amount offered.
A valid fixed-term contract ends on its expiry date. Ending it earlier without a just cause entitles the employee to compensation of 1.5 monthly salaries for each month remaining until the end of the term, capped at 12. If the fixed-term contract has in fact become indefinite — for example, because the temporary cause was simulated — the general dismissal rules apply.