The legal quality of an outsourcing arrangement in Peru is decided less by the lawyers who draft the contract than by the managers who work alongside the contractor’s staff every day. A procurement team can negotiate a textbook service agreement, and a site manager can undo it within months by treating the vendor’s technicians as members of his own team.
This is a particular challenge for multinational groups, whose operating models tend to favor integrated teams, unified tools and global policies that apply to “everyone on site”. Those habits are reasonable from a management perspective. Under Peruvian law, they can become evidence that the client, not the contractor, is the real employer. This article sets out where the line falls and how to keep managers on the right side of it. It builds on our guide to outsourcing and staffing in Peru.
Why day-to-day management matters legally
Law 29245 permits outsourcing only when the contractor keeps its workers under its exclusive subordination, alongside the other autonomy requirements explained in outsourcing requirements under Peruvian law. Subordination, in Peruvian employment law, is the power to direct, supervise and discipline. It is also one of the three elements, together with personal service and pay, from which article 4 of the Productivity and Competitiveness Law presumes an indefinite-term employment contract.
Legal note
If the client exercises the powers of direction over contractor staff, the arrangement risks being recharacterized under Law 29245: the workers are treated as having a direct, indefinite-term employment relationship with the client. Labor inspectors apply the primacy-of-reality principle, so actual practice prevails over contract wording.
The dividing line: the service versus the person
A useful rule of thumb for line managers is that the client manages what is delivered, and the contractor manages who delivers it and how they work.
| Topic | What the client can do | What to avoid | Safer alternative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work requests | Define scope, priorities and service levels | Assigning tasks to named individuals | Route requests to the contractor’s supervisor or a ticket queue |
| Working time | Set the hours the service must be available | Approving overtime, leave or shift swaps | Contractor manages rosters to meet coverage |
| Quality | Measure results against the contract | Evaluating or ranking individual workers | Service reviews with the contractor’s manager |
| Conduct | Require compliance with site, security and safety rules | Applying the client’s disciplinary procedure | Contractor investigates and disciplines; client may request replacement per contract |
| Identity | Issue contractor badges and access rights | Client email titles, uniforms and org-chart listing | Clearly marked contractor accounts and IDs |
Instructions and communication channels
The single most common problem is informal direct instruction. A client manager messages a contractor technician to “take care of this first”, then again the next day, until the technician effectively reports to the client. The fix is structural: a designated contractor supervisor, a ticketing or request system that belongs to the service, and a rule that client managers do not assign work to individuals. Where the contractor is small and has no on-site supervisor, the contract should at least specify a remote coordinator who receives and allocates all requests.
Working time and attendance
The client can require the service to run between certain hours and can control physical access to its premises for security reasons. What it should avoid is managing the individuals’ working time: recording contractor staff in its own attendance system as if they were employees, approving their leave or overtime, or deciding who works which shift. Access logs kept for security are legitimate, but they should not double as the contractor’s timekeeping.
Onboarding, training and safety
Site inductions, safety briefings and confidentiality training are not only permitted but, in the case of health and safety, required. Under Law 29783, the employer guarantees safe conditions at its workplace, and failing to verify that contractors and intermediaries comply with health and safety rules is a serious infringement under article 27.16 of Supreme Decree 019-2006-TR. Where the activity is high-risk, SCTR (supplementary occupational-risk insurance) must also be in place for exposed workers of contractors. Training on the client’s internal processes, by contrast, should be limited to what the service requires and, ideally, delivered through the contractor.
Performance and discipline
Global performance programs are a frequent source of risk. If contractor staff appear in the client’s rating cycle, receive the client’s bonuses or recognition awards, or are subject to its disciplinary procedure, the client is exercising employer powers. The client should assess the service and raise concerns with the contractor, which then decides what to do with its own personnel. A contractual right to request the replacement of a worker for objective reasons is common and reasonable, provided it is exercised through the contractor.
Watch out
Global vendor-management policies sometimes require the client to “approve” each contractor worker, interview candidates or set minimum ratings for individuals. In Peru, these controls should be rewritten as requirements the contractor must meet, such as qualifications, background checks and certifications, rather than as the client selecting and managing people.
Does the recent court ruling change any of this?
Not for line managers. Supreme Decree 001-2022-TR, which prohibited outsourcing the core of a company’s business, was declared null by the Supreme Court in a popular action (acción popular, the proceeding used to challenge regulations that exceed the law they implement). That opens the door to outsourcing activities that were off-limits between 2022 and the ruling, and its current status should be verified before relying on it. But more outsourcing of central functions means more contractor staff working closely with client teams, which makes the discipline described above more important, not less. Autonomy and exclusive direction by the contractor remain the test.
Illustrative scenario
Illustrative scenario
Illustrative scenario: a Japanese manufacturing group applies its global vendor policy in its Peruvian plant. The policy requires plant managers to interview every vendor technician, include them in the monthly “all-hands” recognition scheme and apply the group’s safety disciplinary code directly to anyone on site. The facility management contractor’s 30 workers therefore report to plant supervisors for daily priorities and are disciplined by them for safety breaches. A Peruvian adaptation would keep the safety standards, but require the contractor to enforce them; replace interviews with qualification requirements the contractor certifies; exclude vendor staff from employee recognition; and route all daily requests through the contractor’s shift lead.
Checklist for line managers
A short list that can be handed to managers who work with outsourced teams:
- Send requests to the contractor’s supervisor or ticket queue, not to individuals.
- Do not approve leave, overtime, shift changes or absences of contractor staff.
- Do not evaluate, rank, reward or discipline contractor staff; raise concerns with the contractor.
- Do not add contractor staff to internal teams, org charts or employee-only communications.
- Keep contractor accounts, badges and email addresses clearly identified as such.
- Enforce site, security and safety rules, and report breaches to the contractor.
- Escalate to legal when the service scope changes or the contractor’s supervisor stops attending.
Common mistakes
- Assuming seniority solves the problem. Senior engineers from an IT vendor embedded in client squads are still subordinated to whoever directs their work.
- Using the client’s collaboration tools without boundaries. Shared channels are practical, but daily task assignment through them is evidence of direction.
- Confusing access control with timekeeping.
- Letting the contractor’s supervisor disappear because the service “runs itself”.
- Treating staffing agency rules as if they applied. With a staffing agency, the client does direct the workers, but only in the limited cases Law 27626 allows. The distinction is explained in outsourcing vs. staffing agencies in Peru.
What is at stake
If management practices create subordination, the outsourcing can be recharacterized, with the workers treated as the client’s direct, indefinite-term employees, and SUNAFIL, Peru’s labor inspection authority, can impose administrative fines. Even without recharacterization, a client that receives continuously displaced contractor staff is jointly liable for their labor and social security entitlements during the displacement and for one year afterwards. The broader signals and exposure are covered in when outsourcing is recharacterized in Peru.
Preventive recommendations
As a professional recommendation, groups operating in Peru should:
- Write a short Peruvian annex to global vendor-management and site policies.
- Require an identified contractor supervisor or coordinator in every service contract.
- Train managers who work with vendors, with concrete examples of acceptable and risky behavior.
- Review access, systems and communication tools to separate contractor staff from employees.
- Audit a sample of outsourced services each year for signs of drift.
Our outsourcing and staffing advisory can help design these rules and train the managers who apply them.
Closing thoughts
Managing outsourced personnel well in Peru is not about keeping contractors at arm’s length. It is about respecting a clear division of roles: the client defines and checks the service; the contractor directs its people. When global policies and local managers are aligned with that division, integrated operations and legal compliance can coexist.